Rural Home
Schooling and
Place-based Education
The following article is from the Office of Educational Research and
Improvement which is part of the Department of Education.
THIS DIGEST WAS CREATED BY ERIC, THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION
CENTER. FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT ERIC, CONTACT ACCESS ERIC
1-800-LET-ERIC
Place-based education, which draws from local culture, history, and
geography to create a meaningful curriculum, can occur in any type of
setting, but it holds particular promise for rural homeschooling.
Place-based educators use local particulars to teach universal concepts,
engage students in community life, and involve people and resources unique
to the home community. This Digest identifies ways that place-based
education can counter common concerns about homeschooling so that
homeschooled students--especially those living in rural areas--receive
academic, social, and individual benefits.
HOMESCHOOLING IN THE RURAL UNITED STATES
According to the National Center for Education Statistics, an estimated
850,000 U.S. students were being homeschooled in 1999, comprising 1.7
percent of the nation's school-age population. In rural areas, the
percentage of homeschooled students was 2.2 percent--slightly higher than
the national average. About one third (32.4 percent) of the homeschooling
population lives in rural areas as defined by the U.S. Census
classification (Bielick, Chandler, & Broughman, 2001).
Parents who commit to homeschooling do so for a variety of reasons.
Nearly half believe they can give their children a better education at
home; others have religious reasons (38 percent) or consider the learning
environments at their local schools to be of poor quality (Bielick,
Chandler, & Broughman, 2001). A small percentage (2.7) of parents
indicated "transportation convenience" as an important reason for
homeschooling. A recent study did document long bus rides for rural
students (about a quarter lasting more than an hour each way), often over
poor or mountainous roads (Howley & Howley, 2001). Regardless of the
reasons, interest and participation in homeschooling are increasing.
PLACE-BASED EDUCATION AND RURAL HOMESCHOOLING
Rural parents who homeschool have an opportunity to instill in their
children an appreciation for local values and places, and to integrate the
local ecology and economy into the students' education. Orr (1992) gives
several reasons for integrating place-based study into education:
* to join intellect with
experience
* to address problems of
overspecialization in the world today
* to help people learn how
to live well where they are
* to strengthen
understanding of the significance of relationships among different places,
both local and global
Through such an approach,
which can be employed in schools or at home, young people can learn more
about how to live productive and meaningful lives in their home
communities (Haas & Nachtigal, 1998).
Homeschooling offers opportunities to take different, more
individualized approaches to instruction and curriculum in order to
capitalize on students' interests and learning preferences and community
learning opportunities. In other words, the flexibility inherent in
homeschooling can be used to students' advantage in various ways.
Although studying homeschoolers is a difficult task (Hill, 2000),
evidence reveals that homeschoolers do not always grasp the opportunity to
vary from traditional classroom approaches (Webb, 1990). Some stick to
traditional educational practices (such as fixed schedules, structured
study environments, and standardized curricula and tests) whether or not
these practices serve educational goals (Whitehead & Bird, 1984). However,
a study of more than 1,600 families (Ray, 1997) showed that 71 percent of
homeschooling parents design their own curricula, compared with nearly 24
percent who purchase and use a complete curriculum package.
HOMESCHOOLING'S EFFECTS ON SOCIETY
One concern surrounding the homeschooling movement is that personal
independence and self-sufficiency will take precedence over what is best
for society at large. Critical observers of homeschooling argue that those
who practice this form of education are giving up on solving common
problems and that social stratification is a consequence of their actions
(Apple, 2000; Lubienski,2000). Underlying these concerns are commitments
to the common school, including shared goals and strengthening community.
In response, supporters--also arguing from a critical
perspective--contend that the current public education system is defined
more by national economic interests than by local concerns and commitments
(Davidson, 1996). People making this argument view homeschoolers' exit
from the public school system as a withdrawal from political and business
control, rather than as a withdrawal from society and the common good (Van
Galen & Pitman, 1991).
For other supporters of homeschooling, withdrawal from society may
indeed be one of the goals. Van Galen (1991) explains that religious
conservatives who have chosen homeschooling usually want their children to
learn a religious way of life and develop conservative social and
political perspectives. These parents establish homeschools to teach their
children that "the family is the most important institution in society"
(p. 35).
Public schools may not be doing any better at creating societal
cohesion than homeschoolers, however. Research has shown that graduates of
large, diverse public high schools are "less" likely than homeschooled
youth to express tolerant attitudes, to volunteer time and money for
social causes, or to participate in community events (Hill, 2000).
HOMESCHOOLING AND SOCIALIZATION
Both supporters and opponents of homeschooling emphasize the importance
of learning necessary social skills (Webb, 1990; Whitehead & Bird, 1984).
A major criticism of homeschooling is the social isolation of the student
(Van Galen & Pitman, 1991). However, the public school process of sorting
children by age and ability and isolating them from their parents and
siblings can produce its own forms of social isolation (Howley, DeYoung, &
Theobald, 1996). The tacit lesson in such an arrangement can be conformity
(Van Galen & Pitman, 1991).
Medlin (2000) separates the socialization issue into three goals that
can guide home educators:
1. participation of
homeschooled children in daily routines of their local communities
2. acquisition of rules of
behavior and systems of beliefs and attitudes needed both during their
education and later in life
3. ability to function
effectively as contributing members of society
Attending to these socialization goals may help guide parents in
planning activities that encompass a concern for others, whether they live
in one's own rural community or in a distant city or nation.
ACADEMIC VALUE OF METHODS AND CURRICULUM
Another criticism of homeschooling is that modern teaching methods and
materials are not always used. Underlying this criticism is an assumption
that professional educators generally know "what works" to educate
children--a much debated assumption. What is clearer is that both groups
of educators--public school teachers and homeschooling parents--can be
overwhelmed by the number of subjects that need to be taught.
A growing number of educators in small schools and homeschools have
discovered that place-based methodologies can be used to integrate
separate disciplines and subject matter with home and community projects.
Student interests combine with daily living activities and practical
experience in a variety of interconnected subjects to help children gain
both practical and academic knowledge (Webb, 1990).
Activities specific to place-based education might concentrate on
community themes, local occupations and hobbies, local government and
history, or community concerns (Knapp, 1996). The homeschooled student can
be guided to collect, organize, and analyze relevant information; produce
a worthwhile project or result from their study; and reflect on and
self-assess progress.
A well-known example of rural place-based education is Foxfire,
initiated by Eliot Wigginton in the late 1960s (Wigginton, 1985). Youth
interviewed members of the local community, unearthing and publishing a
multitude of stories from the residents. Foxfire has grown into a teaching
and learning method used in a variety of educational settings. The method
stresses 11 core ideals that include active learning; an audience beyond
the teacher; and connections among the classroom work, surrounding
communities, and the world beyond (Foxfire Fund, 2001).
Another example of community-based learning is the PACERS Small Schools
Cooperative, initiated by the University of Alabama, in which students
have become community historians, scientists, and artists (PACERS, 2001).
Participating schools incorporate local needs into the curriculum,
creating projects as varied as a community newspaper and a small business
that builds computers for local residents (Cedar Bluff School, 2001;
Gaylesville School, 2001).
One innovative program, "Elders' Wisdom, Children's Song," encourages
communication between older community members and school-age children.
Students interview community elders and develop songs, plays, public
recitations, artwork, and publications based on their stories (Community
Celebration of Place, 2001).
Although rural areas may lack such homeschooling resources as museums,
Internet communications, and expansive libraries, other assets abound, as
these school-based examples illustrate. The knowledge and experience of
elders, the close proximity to the natural environment, and the skills and
practical knowledge of rural residents who live without metropolitan
conveniences can be valuable resources for homeschooling. By utilizing
these unique resources, students may obtain practical experience in a
variety of interconnected subjects. The community becomes not only the
classroom but also the audience for the students' accomplishments (Knapp,
1996).
SUMMARY
Homeschooling parents can guide their children in discovering and
appreciating the values, economy, history, and ecology of their home
communities. At the same time, they can provide for children's academic
learning and social development. These goals can be reached by planning
activities that combine real-life experience with academic learning; using
an interdisciplinary approach; and working in cooperation with others in
the community to accomplish projects or produce useful products. Rural
homeschools offer unusual flexibility and opportunities for practicing a
place-based approach to education that can benefit both the students and
their communities.
REFERENCES
Apple, M. W. (2000). The cultural politics of home schooling. Peabody
Journal of Education, 75(1 & 2), 256-71.
Bielick, S., Chandler, K., & Broughman, S. P. (2001). Homeschooling in
the United States: 1999. (NCES 2001-033). Washington, DC: U.S. Department
of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National
Center for Education Statistics.
Cedar Bluff School. (2001). Home page [online]. Retrieved December 18,
2001, from http://www.pacers.org/schools/cedar_bluff/index.htm
Community Celebration of Place. (2001). Elders' wisdom, children's song
[online]. Retrieved December 18, 2001, from http://www.communitycelebration.org/elder/index.html
Davidson, O. G. (1996). Broken heartland: The rise of America's rural
ghetto. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
The Foxfire Fund, Inc. (2001). The Foxfire approach to teaching &
learning [online]. Retrieved December 18, 2001, from http://www.foxfire.org/teachi.htm
Gaylesville School. (2001). The Gaylesville Enterprise Online.
Gaylesville, AL. Retrieved December 18, 2001, from http://www.pacers.org/schools/gaylesville/enterprise.html
Haas, T., & Nachtigal, P. (1998). Place value: An educator's guide to
good literature on rural lifeways, environments, and purposes of
education. Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small
Schools. (ED 420 461)
Hill, P. T. (2000). Home schooling and the future of public education.
Peabody Journal of Education, 75(1 & 2), 20-31.
Howley, C., DeYoung, A., & Theobald, P. (1996). Rural blues: How middle
schools threaten rural communities. American School Board Journal, 183(4),
42-44.
Howley, A., & Howley, C. (2001). Rural school busing. ERIC Digest.
Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools.
Knapp, C. E. (1996). Just beyond the classroom: Community adventures
for interdisciplinary learning. Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on
Rural Education and Small Schools. (ED 388 485)
Lubienski, C. (2000). Whither the common good? A critique of home
schooling. Peabody Journal of Education, 75(1 & 2), 207-32.
Medlin, R. G. (2000). Home schooling and the question of socialization.
Peabody Journal of Education, 75(1 & 2), 107-23.
Orr, D. W. (1992). Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to
a postmodern world. New York: State University of New York Press.
PACERS Small Schools Cooperative. (2001). Tuscaloosa, Alabama:
University of Alabama. Retrieved December 18, 2001, from http://www.pacers.org
Ray, B. D. (1997). Home education across the United States. Family
characteristics, student achievement, & longitudinal traits. Purcellville,
VA: Home School Legal Defense Association. Retrieved December 18, 2001,
from http://www.hslda.org/docs/study/ray1997/default.asp
Van Galen, J. A. (1991). Ideologues and pedagogues: Parents who teach
their children at home. In J. Van Galen & M. A. Pitman (Eds.), Home
schooling: Political, historical, and pedagogical perspectives (pp.
63-76). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
Van Galen, J., & Pitman, M. A. (Eds.). (1991). Home schooling:
Political, historical, and pedagogical perspectives. Social and Policy
Issues in Education: The University of Cincinnati Series. Norwood, NJ:
Ablex Publishing.
Webb, J. (1990). Children learning at home. London: The Falmer Press.
Whitehead, J. W., & Bird, W. R. (1984). Home education and
constitutional liberties: The historical and constitutional arguments in
support of home instruction. Westchester, IL: Crossway Books.
Wigginton, B. E. (1985). Sometimes a shining moment: The Foxfire
experience. Twenty years teaching in a high school classroom. New York:
Anchor Books.
-----
Rebecca Jaycox is an administrator in a small city school district in
southeastern Ohio.
This publication was prepared with funding from the Office of
Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education, under
contract no. ED-99-CO-0027. The opinions expressed herein do not
necessarily reflect the positions or policies of OERI, the Department, or
AEL.
Title: Rural Home Schooling and Place-Based Education. ERIC Digest.
Document Type: Information Analyses---ERIC Information Analysis
Products (IAPs) (071); Information Analyses---ERIC Digests (Selected) in
Full Text (073);
Available From: ERIC/CRESS, P.O. Box 1348, Charleston, WV
25325-1348. Tel: 800-624-9120 (Toll Free). For full text: http://www.ael.org/eric/digests/edorc01-9.htm.
Descriptors: Active Learning, Educational Strategies, Elementary
Secondary Education, Experiential Learning, Home Schooling, Integrated
Curriculum, Interpersonal Competence, Parents as Teachers, Rural
Education, Socialization
Identifiers: ERIC Digests, Place Based Education, Sense of
Community
|